Computer Aided Engineering Journal & Forums

  • Home
  • Forums
  • Help
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Members
Current time: 09-08-2010, 11:06 AM



Computer Aided Engineering Journal & Forums / General / Science & Technology News / NASA, Don't need to go to the Moon. Develop new technologies instead
Post New Reply 
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
NASA, Don't need to go to the Moon. Develop new technologies instead
02-01-2010, 07:53 PM
Post: 1
continuum Offline
Moderator
Super Moderators
Posts: 200
Joined: Oct 2008
Here comes the new budget.

Scrubbing the proposed Moon missions. Develop new rocket tech instead.
Private agencies are going to come in too.

Source:
Quote:President Barack Obama is redirecting America's space program, killing NASA's $100 billion plans to return astronauts to the moon and using much of that money for new rocket technology research.
Visit this user's website Find 
Reply 
02-01-2010, 08:31 PM
Post: 2
kyjongl Offline
Junior
Posts: 27
Joined: Nov 2008
Man, more job loss Sad
Find 
Reply 
02-02-2010, 01:49 PM
Post: 3
markrw Offline
PE
Posts: 13
Joined: Apr 2009
I'm in the aerospace industry so perhaps I don't see the overall picture. But it does seem dumb cutting such programs.

Obama: I'm going to create jobs by funding high speed rail.

What kind of jobs are going to be created by that? Seems to me the majority of them are laying tracks, grading the railbed and the like. Just what we need: more ditch digging as opposed to high end technology jobs that are created by the space program.
Find 
Reply 
02-02-2010, 02:21 PM
Post: 4
kinematic Offline
Senior
Posts: 102
Joined: Nov 2008
(02-02-2010 01:49 PM)markrw Wrote:  I'm in the aerospace industry so perhaps I don't see the overall picture. But it does seem dumb cutting such programs.

Obama: I'm going to create jobs by funding high speed rail.

What kind of jobs are going to be created by that? Seems to me the majority of them are laying tracks, grading the railbed and the like. Just what we need: more ditch digging as opposed to high end technology jobs that are created by the space program.

Point well made. I was gonna say a similar observation. Now NASA has to rely on the Russians to make trips to the IST. How about servicing the Hubble? It needs a push once in a while to maintain orbit.

So much of technologies came out of the whole space program. Not to mention all the University funding and associated programs. faculty tenure, student scholarships, private contractors etc.

Similar problem came out after scrubbing the Comanche helicopter program. Boeing suffered a lot.
Find 
Reply 
02-03-2010, 12:44 AM
Post: 5
continuum Offline
Moderator
Super Moderators
Posts: 200
Joined: Oct 2008
It seems that NASA is opening up lots of other opportunities.
Here (opens a PDF) the remarks from deputy administrator Lori Garver at the OSTP budget announcement.

Excerpt:
Quote:With President Obama’s new direction to NASA, we will be investing billions in the best peer reviewed research, innovative new technologies, dramatic flight demonstrations, and in building an inclusive new space industry, all of which are designed to again position NASA a national leader in research and development activities, and in meeting critical national needs.
Visit this user's website Find 
Reply 
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post New Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Starry, starry 'first light' from NASA's WISE mission industrynews 0 48 01-08-2010 02:21 PM
Last Post: industrynews
  CES: NASA's Kepler finds five 'hot Jupiters' industrynews 0 54 01-08-2010 02:21 PM
Last Post: industrynews
  CES: NASA's next frontier: Venus, the moon, or an asteroid industrynews 0 56 01-08-2010 02:21 PM
Last Post: industrynews

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread

Contact Us | Home | Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2010 MyBB Group | © 2010 CAE Journal (Computer Aided Engineering Journal)
Product names and trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders.
None of the trademark holders listed are affiliated with this website or forum.
No endorsement of any information, service or product by any company or person is made or implied.